One thing that stands out in the Democratic nomination race is the fierceness of the campaign between Hillary and Barack--a level perhaps not seen in many decades.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/654d3/654d3494247d14abce194e3d9fde4305c48c5019" alt=""
Hillary Clinton bashing
While the supporters of Obama can speak endlessly of the virtues of their candidate and of an Obama presidency, the raging Obama mania can't justify nor explain the severity of Hillary bashing ongoing in America and the media. Just a cursory view of news headlines on the American political scene gets across the image of Hillary as one punching bag figure. Her political statements, views and record must have earned her the bashing. But to what degree? The fact that she started strong in the democratic nomination campaign must also account for the fierce anti-Hillary propaganda. It is but logical for the Obama adherents to launch a demolition campaign with the strength level corresponding or exceeding that of the opposition.
Barack's strong charisma and youth appeal are of course advantages over Hillary but do these significantly account for the denigration of Hillary and the magnification of her negatives? Admittedly, Obama's rhetorical advantage is a big factor. On the other, Hillary's performance as former First Lady and as senator are not actually bad either. Something to do with their public service records? Nope, because not one of the two has the monopoly of integrity problems. The wide difference in policy platform perhaps? Judging from the socialist tones in some of their speeches, both seem to have good, populist tendencies so that can't be it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a700/3a7007e04f4272287d33962e23023f5811d58b03" alt=""
Patriarchal America
The fact that America, the supposed bastion and protector of Western-style democracy, never had a woman chief executive nor even a vice-president in all 200 or so years of existence might explain a culture that does not tolerate or welcome female leadership. A number of countries in the Eastern part of the globe that had been influenced by democracy in the 20th and 21st centuries have already produced women leaders. It's been puzzling for outsiders why America has yet to taste the presidency of a woman, even as it has been conveniently using the rhetoric of democracy to pursue major international interests.
A possible Obama win in the November presidential race should be, without a doubt, also a good thing in so far as giving another disadvantaged sector of the American society a leadership voice. The black Americans, after all, had to go through a lot before attaining some level of equality with the whites and other races in society.
Black men got the vote first than the women, white & black
However, a cursory study into U.S. history would show that the blacks actually gained equal rights earlier than the women. Yes, the blacks--well, only the black men--gained the right to vote earlier than the women did by virtue of the 15th Amendment to the Constitution.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9208/a9208aaad8aa84aa6098eadd5b5a59828555abf6" alt=""
This author has learned quite late in her life that good old America is a patriarchal land where the female is the "other" sex and the male is the norm. Is it patriarchal democracy at work in the U.S. or simply, patriarchal bias? Is this same patriarchal bias working so against the Hillary campaign.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/108cf/108cf8f0dd761aba1d7f88661e5ff8a13d48f2c2" alt=""
****************